
Counterfeit Aircraft Parts: Real-World Incidents and Lessons Learned
The aviation industry depends on trust, traceability, and rigorous quality control to ensure every flight remains safe and reliable. Yet, even within this highly regulated environment, the growing problem of counterfeit aircraft parts has exposed dangerous vulnerabilities. When unauthorized or falsified components infiltrate the global supply chain, the consequences can be both financially catastrophic and life-threatening. Recent investigations into high-profile cases have forced the industry to reassess how documentation, traceability, and compliance are managed.
One of the most alarming examples surfaced with the exposure of AOG Technics, a UK-based supplier accused of distributing thousands of fraudulent parts. Investigations revealed falsified documentation accompanying critical engine components, including bushings used in CFM56 and CF6 engines. The scandal serves as a stark reminder of the importance of lifecycle documentation and robust traceability within the aviation ecosystem.
The AOG Technics Scandal: A Wake-Up Call for Aviation
The AOG Technics scandal began surfacing publicly in mid-2023, sending shockwaves across the global aviation community. Regulatory authorities, including the UK Civil Aviation Authority (CAA) and the European Union Aviation Safety Agency (EASA), have discovered forged airworthiness certificates associated with engine parts. According to Reuters, over 120 aircraft worldwide were affected by components sourced from AOG Technics with falsified documentation. Airlines such as Delta, United, and Southwest faced operational disruptions as they scrambled to verify the integrity of affected parts.
The core issue centered on the bushings used in the CFM56 and CF6 engine models, which power thousands of Airbus and Boeing aircraft worldwide. Falsified release certificates misrepresented the origin and inspection history of components, rendering their airworthiness unverifiable. CFM International, the joint venture between GE Aerospace and Safran, had to alert operators worldwide about the potential risks.

Investigations uncovered that AOG Technics had operated without holding approved distributorships from major OEMs. Thousands of parts came with Authorized Release Certificates (ARCs), creating an urgent compliance crisis for the affected operators.
The scandal led to the launch of a criminal investigation by UK authorities, underscoring the severity of the breach. Industry leaders are now calling for tighter digital controls, immutable recordkeeping, and better verification tools to prevent similar incidents. The incident is no longer just a cautionary tale but a catalyst driving change across aviation maintenance and supply chain management.
How Counterfeit Aircraft Parts Enter the Supply Chain
Counterfeit aircraft parts do not arise from a single point of failure, but rather emerge from complex vulnerabilities within global supply chains. Independent distributors, brokers, and surplus dealers often operate without the same level of oversight as OEM-authorized suppliers. Fraudulent actors exploit gaps in paper-based documentation, legacy record-keeping systems, and fragmented data management.
In the case of AOG Technics, falsified documents presented a veneer of legitimacy, allowing non-conforming parts to pass through several layers of procurement. Many MROs rely heavily on the validity of ARC documents without always verifying their authenticity at the source. The traditional reliance on paper records, emailed PDFs, or loosely structured databases creates an environment where manipulation becomes easier. A survey published by Aviation Week in 2024 found that 38% of MROs experienced issues with incomplete or unverifiable parts documentation in the past year.
Global parts demand, driven by the post-pandemic surge in air travel, has also strained supply chains, creating pressure to source components quickly. Operators facing long lead times from OEMs may turn to secondary markets, inadvertently exposing themselves to counterfeit risks. Furthermore, the lack of centralized, accessible traceability tools amplifies the difficulty of tracking a part’s full lifecycle. In the absence of digital, tamper-proof traceability, bad actors can infiltrate even the most reputable networks.
Regulatory bodies, including the FAA, EASA, and CAA, have issued urgent directives calling for audits of all inventory linked to AOG Technics. Airlines were required to ground affected aircraft until components were verified or replaced, leading to canceled flights and disrupted schedules worldwide. The cost of reactive mitigation far outweighs the investment required in proactive traceability systems.
The Cost of Counterfeit Aircraft Parts: Safety and Financial Impact
Counterfeit aircraft parts present both a significant safety hazard and a massive financial burden for operators and maintainers. Improperly certified parts may lack the material integrity, precise manufacturing tolerances, or fatigue resistance necessary for safe flight. Even non-critical components can cause secondary damage if they fail unexpectedly during operations.
The financial costs associated with counterfeit aircraft parts extend well beyond the replacement price of the component itself. Airlines impacted by the AOG Technics scandal reported millions in lost revenue due to aircraft groundings, missed schedules, and emergency inspections. Delta Airlines confirmed that less than 1% of its mainline fleet engines—approximately 21 engines—were found to contain parts with falsified documentation supplied by AOG Technics, and all affected aircraft were immediately removed from service for part replacement in late 2023. Additionally, the reputational damage from safety concerns poses long-term brand risks for operators.
Warranty disputes also arise when OEMs decline responsibility for damages resulting from the use of unauthorized parts. Insurance complications further compound the issue, as policies may not cover incidents involving non-approved components. The National Transportation Safety Board (NTSB) has consistently warned that counterfeit parts contribute to avoidable mechanical failures, increasing the risk of catastrophic outcomes.
A significant but often overlooked cost involves the manual labor hours required to audit, inspect, and verify documentation after an incident. MRO facilities report diverting entire teams to manually trace part histories, which introduces further opportunity costs and operational strain. In response, stakeholders are now recognizing that the key to avoiding such losses lies in preventative, not reactive, solutions.
Strengthening Traceability to Prevent Counterfeit Aircraft Parts
The primary defense against counterfeit aircraft parts lies in robust, end-to-end traceability solutions built on secure digital platforms. Lifecycle documentation, including back-to-birth (BtB) trace, ensures every component’s history is transparent and verifiable. Instead of relying on paper-based systems or fragmented databases, operators are turning toward digitized records that integrate directly with MRO processes.
A digital traceability platform captures everything from manufacturing certificates to maintenance logs, lease transfers, and repair histories. This reduces the likelihood of falsified documents slipping into the supply chain undetected. A 2025 report from the International Air Transport Association (IATA) revealed that airlines using digital BtB trace systems reduced component verification time by 62%. Digitization not only improves compliance but also accelerates lease transitions, audits, and routine maintenance.

Verification of authenticity becomes exponentially easier when you can easily index, search, and tamper-proof documentation. Advanced tools now leverage machine learning to validate document consistency, flag anomalies, and match maintenance records against OEM data. Instead of scrambling to confirm part provenance after a scandal, operators with robust digital records can immediately determine whether their fleets are affected.
Regulatory bodies are now recommending, and in some cases mandating, the adoption of digital traceability standards. EASA and the FAA have both emphasized the role of technology in safeguarding supply chains from future counterfeit threats. As the AOG Technics case demonstrates, the costs of inaction are far higher than the investment in proper documentation infrastructure.
Lessons Learned and the Future of Aviation Compliance
The AOG Technics scandal represents more than just a rogue supplier exploiting documentation loopholes—it is a systemic failure of traceability. The aviation industry must accept that paper-based records, email chains, and fragmented PDFs are no longer sufficient for modern compliance requirements. The complexity of global supply chains demands digital-first solutions that offer visibility from manufacturing to decommissioning.
Lessons learned from this crisis extend beyond airlines to MROs, lessors, and regulatory authorities. Proactive documentation management prevents not only fraudulent parts from entering service but also reduces downtime, lease transition delays, and audit failures. An integrated approach to lifecycle traceability promotes collaboration among stakeholders, enhances regulatory compliance, and enhances operational resilience.
Regulatory agencies are expected to introduce stricter penalties for non-compliance, further incentivizing the adoption of secure trace systems. The industry’s future depends on collaboration, transparency, and investment in tools that ensure trust in every aircraft component. The AOG Technics incident may ultimately serve as the turning point that propels the industry toward full digital transformation.
Protect Your Fleet With Proven Traceability
Counterfeit aircraft parts are a growing threat to safety, compliance, and operational efficiency across the aviation industry. ProvenAir delivers a comprehensive, automated digital traceability solution that safeguards your fleet with verified back-to-birth documentation. Our platform streamlines compliance, accelerates maintenance, and prevents counterfeit risks before they impact your operations. Learn more about how ProvenAir protects your assets.